You'd dare to revise my edits? I shall contribute none.

The only thing people need is my guide and Eye-Bo, the ocular fitness program. Well, to be serious, I'm still for that guide generator idea that spits out a tailored glossary and guide made specifically for the user in question. I dislike the idea of an encyclopedia with hundreds of pages to further convolute a subjective area that's already interpreted in too many ways to count. Your encyclopedia is one, giant frontload. We need machine-tailored frontloads, know what I'm sayin'? I guess the one thing holding this generator idea back is the lack of textual content for it.

That's a lot of "presentation" if you ask me.

I think it's a good idea, but you definitely need more people contributing. I think people would be more willing to contribute if you gave a general guideline of what the wiki should be/have.

You mean subconscious? That's definitely a dirtier word.